A growing debate has emerged within the United Arab Emirates over the strategic value of hosting UAE US military bases debate, as recent regional conflict has exposed new vulnerabilities rather than guaranteed protection. Influential voices, including prominent political analysts and commentators, are openly questioning whether the long-standing security arrangement with the United States continues to serve the UAE’s national interests in a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape. The debate has intensified in the aftermath of the 2026 Iran-related escalation, during which the UAE faced missile and drone attacks targeting locations linked to U.S. military presence. Analysts argue that these bases, historically viewed as deterrents, may now function as strategic liabilities by attracting hostile attention. One leading Emirati political scientist remarked that the bases “added little” to direct defense while potentially giving adversaries justification for retaliation. This reassessment reflects a broader shift across Gulf nations, where traditional security alliances are being re-evaluated amid evolving threats, technological advancements in warfare, and changing global power dynamics. The UAE’s internal discourse highlights a critical question: whether reliance on external military protection remains viable in an era of asymmetric conflict and regional instability. Rising Criticism of U.S. Military Presence Criticism of U.S. military bases in the UAE has gained traction following recent attacks linked to regional tensions. Prominent Emirati academic Abdulkhaleq Abdulla has argued that the UAE successfully defended itself during Iranian strikes using its own capabilities, including advanced missile defense systems. He suggested that the presence of U.S. bases did not significantly contribute to protection …